Legal Opinion
Seemann v. Eneix
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 2, 1930PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
By this suit in equity the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant Bneix, hereinafter called the defendant, money alleged to be due from him to the plaintiff by reason of business dealings between them during the period from 1922 to 1928, in connection with the sale of goods manufactured by the defendant L. G. Balfour Company, hereinafter called the defendant corporation, and to reach and apply in satisfaction of a debt certain stock of the defendant corporation. The defendant filed an answer and a cross bill. The case was referred to a master who made a report. The evidence is not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- McMurtrie v. GuilerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Electric Welding Co. v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.