Atlantic National Bank v. Hupp Motor Car Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
On April 11, 1935, the plaintiff entered in the Superior Court the bill together with a writ in which the bill was not “inserted” as a declaration was inserted *197in the writ at common law (Whiting v. Houghton, 228 Mass. 429; G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 214, §§ 7; 8), although the writ commanded the sheriff to summon the defendants to appear and answer to the plaintiff “in a bill in equity.” But no point was made of that matter. Instead, the defendant Hupp Motor Car Corporation, a Virginia corporation (hereinafter called the defendant), unsuccessfully attacked the service upon its agent in this…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- A. J. Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Godard v. Babson-Dow Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Wilson v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.