Legal Opinion
Sanabia v. Travelers Insurance Co.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided February 9, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R A. D. A., Rule 8A appeal by plaintiff Carlos Sanabia ("Sanabia”) of the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Travelers Insurance Company (‘Travelers”) on Sanabia’s G.L.c. 90, §34M claim for Personal Injury Protection benefits (“PIFO •
Sanabia filed a small claims action against Travelers to recover PIP benefits for chiropractic expenses allegedly incurred for the treatment of injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident The court allowed Travelers’ motion to transfer the case to the regular civil docket Travelers then moved to join or to substitute…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Godbout v. CousensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Tate v. Department of Mental HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cruickshank v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
- Knight v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Galena v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Salafia v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Salafia v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.