Legal Opinion

State v. Gallagher

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 29, 2003No. 1 CA-CR 02-0073PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Peter Shaun Gallagher appeals his convictions and sentences on one count of possession of a dangerous' drug and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and in sentencing him as though his convictions for possession of drugs and possession of drug paraphernalia constituted his first and second convictions under Proposition 200. 1 Because only our resolution of the Proposition 200 sentencing issue merits publication, we have considered and affirmed the trial court’s suppression…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. O'BRIEN v. EscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. State v. TousignantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Jackson v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API