State v. Proctor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Ronald Proctor and Robert Olson were convicted following a jury trial of one count of conspiracy and four counts of fraudulent scheme and artifice. The state alleged that eight real estate transactions constituted acts in furtherance of the conspiracy, four of which were the bases of the fraudulent scheme and artifice counts. In their consolidated appeals, both appellants contend that the fraudulent scheme and artifice statute is unconstitutional and that the trial court erred in ordering them to pay restitution. We affirm the convictions and the sentences…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Cicoria v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. ZAPUTILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Tanya K. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.