Legal Opinion

RUTH ET UX v. Hickman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiffs, Adrian Ruth and Mildred Ruth, his wife, to rescind a contract entered into by them for the purchase of a general insurance agency from the defendant, C. Yon Hickman. From a decree in favor of plaintiffs, the defendant has appealed.

The contract involved in this snit was, executed on March 31, 1954. For a number of years prior to that date, the defendant Hickman had been engaged in the insurance business in Eugene under the name of Hickman Insurance Agency. The business was divided into a life insurance agency, to which Hickman…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Schuler Et Ux. v. Humphrey Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Weiss and Hamilton v. GumbertOregon Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Timber & Trading Co. v. NiedermeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. REID v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. MB Contracting Company v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API