Legal Opinion

Federici Et Ux v. Lehman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1962PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action alleging that they had rescinded a contract entered into between themselves and the defendant John Bates for the purchase of real estate situated in the city of Portland and seek to recover back money advanced in the purchase of the property.

The complaint alleges, as grounds for their right to rescind, fraud committed by defendants and mutual rescission by the parties. Defendants deny both contentions of the plaintiffs.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs and the defendants appeal.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs entered into a written…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Todd v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Wheelwright v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Katz v. ObenchainOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Mascall v. EriksonOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Kruse v. BushOregon Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Melms v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ellison v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Kuperman v. EirasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API