Legal Opinion

Westville & Hamden Loan Co. v. Pasqual

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiff was entitled to recover on this joint and several promissory note from the defendants Amirante and Cappiello, two of the signers of the note, the amount due on the note of $300 with interest at the rate of three and one half per cent a month on unpaid balances, provided these defendants’ second defense, that they were obligated to pay the plaintiff more than $300 as principal on five promissory notes which were accepted by the plaintiff in violation of the statute of the State, was not sustained. The statute to which the second defense had reference was the concluding sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sagal v. FylarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Dibiase v. GarnseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Ideal Financing Association v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Tator v. ValdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. D' Angelo Development & Construction Co. v. CordovanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Nicotera Loan Corporation v. GallagherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API