Legal Opinion

Tator v. Valden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1938PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The complaint in this action alleges these material facts: The defendant’s testatrix was the widow of Ebenezer A. Hoyt who died in 1923 a resident of Ridgefield, owning a substantial estate of real and personal property and leaving two wills, one executed in 1886 devising all his property to her and the other in 1912, the only alleged provision of which revoked the 1886 will. Shortly after Ebenezer’s death, his brother Charles learned the contents of the two wills and threatened to protest probating of the 1912 will as a distribution of Ebenezer’s property unfair to his blood relatives. To…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Will on DardisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Avery, Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Funk v. GallivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  3. Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Haynes Construction Co. v. Cascella & Son Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API