Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Gilmore
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 25, 1999No. SC 15914PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether a secondary mortgage issued by an unlicensed lender in violation of General Statutes § 36a-5111 is enforceable in a foreclosure action. Following our grant of certification to appeal, 2 the named defendant, William C. Gilmore,3 appeals from the Appellate Court’s judg*771ment affirming the trial court’s judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiffs, Alan M. Solomon and Mary Ellen Torneo. The defendant claims that a secondary mortgage loan issued by a lender in violation of the licensing requirements of § 36a-511 is not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bernard C. Duse, Jr. v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Brown v. SohSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- D' Angelo Development & Construction Co. v. CordovanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.