Legal Opinion
Dibiase v. Garnsey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
This was an action of replevin to recover possession of a certain auto truck and for damages for its detention. The complaint is in usual form alleging ownership of the truck and right to its possession. The first defense of the answer put in issue all of the allegations of the complaint except ownership. Defendant filed a further special defense, alleging that he was engaged in the business of repairing automobiles and that the plaintiff left with him the truck for repairs, including supplying new parts, which he made; that ‘afterward he demanded payment for his services, which plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phalen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Funk v. GallivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Sagal v. FylarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Finn v. DonahueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Connecticut Breweries Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Savings Bank of Rockville v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- I-5 Truck Sales & Service Co. v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.