Legal Opinion
D' Angelo Development & Construction Co. v. Cordovano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 16, 2006No. SC 17358PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether a new home construction contract that fails to comply with the registration, disclosure and contract language provisions of the New Home Construction Contractors Act, General Statutes § 20-417a et seq.,1 is unenforceable. The defendants, Steven P. Cordovano and Sarah M. Cordovano, appeal from the judgment of the trial court declaring such a contract to be enforceable and declining to invalidate a mechanic’s hen placed on their property by the plaintiff, D’Angelo Development and Construction Company. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- M. Dematteo Construction Co. v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Centex International, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- ATC Partnership v. Coats North America Consolidated, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- D'Angelo Development & Construction Corp. v. CordovanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.