Legal Opinion
Nicotera Loan Corporation v. Gallagher
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 10, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff is a licensee permitted to do business in this State under the so-called Small Loan Act, General Statutes, §§4066-4082, formerly Chapter 219 of the Public Acts of 1929. It took a note for $300 signed jointly and severally by John Gallagher, Sadie Gallagher, Mary Gallagher and Timothy J. Mulloy, and default having occurred, it brought this action to recover the balance due with interest and also to set aside a conveyance claimed to have been fraudulently made by Mary Gallagher to Mary Marcella Mitchell to avoid the grantor’s obligation upon this note. By way of special defense…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sagal v. FylarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Dibiase v. GarnseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Westville & Hamden Loan Co. v. PasqualSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Wells v. Indianapolis Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Ideal Financing Association v. LabonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Tator v. ValdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Atta v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.