Swedish American Hospital v. Midwest Operating Engineers Fringe Benefit Funds
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Swedish American Hospital brings this two count action against defendant Midwest Operating Engineers Fringe Benefit Funds, seeking reimbursement for the cost of hospitalization of three of the Fund’s participants. Presently before this court is the Fund’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we grant the Fund’s motion.
I. Summary Judgment Standard
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is appropriate if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Alice L. Griffin v. Eddie Thomas, Jr. And Board of Education, City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bibart v. StachowiakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Vitug v. Multistate Tax CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Industrial Specialty Chemicals v. Cummins Engine Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Capitol Resource Funding v. American Way, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994