Legal Opinion

Bibart v. Stachowiak

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 27, 1995No. 94 C 3037PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Dianna Bibart brings this ten-count complaint alleging violations of her Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

At approximately midnight on May 18, 1993, defendant Jay Staehowiak, a deputy of the LaSalle County Sheriff’s Department, stopped Dianna Bibart for various traffic violations. 1 Bibart identified herself and gave Staehowiak her date of birth, but…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. James W. Smoak v. Eric Hall, David Bush Jeff Phann Tim McHood Brian Brock Jerry Andrews, LieutenantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Chavez v. Illinois State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  3. Spiegel v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. United States v. AvagyanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Schwartz v. Gwinnett CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API