Legal Opinion

Industrial Specialty Chemicals v. Cummins Engine Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 21, 1996No. 94 C 5378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff Industrial Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (“ISC”) brings this six-count Amended Complaint against Cummins Engine Co., its subsidiary Fleetguard, Inc. (the “Corporate Defendants”), and two of Fleetguard’s employees, Doug Hudgens and Jerry Joyner (the “Individual Defendants”). Presently before this court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Counts I, IV, and V. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Background

Before discussing the material facts at issue, we briefly comment on the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marshall Jackson v. Jack Duckworth, Warden H. Abbott, Investigator C. Adkins, Assistant WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Ceres Illinois, Inc. v. Illinois Scrap Processing, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Architectural Metal Systems, Incorporated v. Consolidated Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ahn v. Midway Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  2. Neal v. City of Harvey, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  3. Phillip D. Tice v. John S. VeachWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API