Legal Opinion
Vitug v. Multistate Tax Commission
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 27, 1994No. 93 C 5357PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Joselito Vitug brings this two count complaint, alleging discrimination in employment practices by defendants Multistate Tax Commission, Executive Director Dan Bucks, Director of Audit Les Koenig, and member commissioners. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted.
I. Summary Judgment Standard
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is appropriate if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MacDonald v. Grace Church SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Joselito Vitug v. Multistate Tax Commission, Dan R. Bucks, as Executive Director, Les Koenig, as Director of AuditCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2016
- Chisholm v. Foothill Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Moher v. Chemfab Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.