Legal Opinion

Wollenburg v. Rynar

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 26, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants agreed to sell to the complainant a strip of land ten feet wide and to the depth of their lot on Clinton Place, Newark, adjoining the land of the complainant, for $560, of which $60 was paid down. A receipt was given which reads as follows:

"Newark, N.J. Nov. 15, 1922. Received from F.R. Wollenburg, $60.00, deposit on 10 ft. (ten ft.) land adjoining stores at Clinton Place and Hawthorne Avenue; depth according to deed. Balance to be paid within two months, the sum of five hundred dollars."

The defense is that the memorandum does not comply with the fifth section of the statute of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bateman v. RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  2. Lippincott v. BridgewaterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stamato v. AgamieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Champion Et Ux. v. Hammer Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. Franklin v. WeltNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  5. Monahan v. McElligottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API