Legal Opinion

Miller v. Headley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 13, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

April 11th, 1931, the defendant William F. Headley, a member of the bar of this state, signed an agreement in writing dated Newark, New Jersey, April 9th, 1931, whereby (it is alleged) he agreed to convey lands at Lake Hopatcong to the complainant, John H. Miller. The agreement reads as follows:

"Whereas, under a certain decree dated March 3, 1931, in foreclosure John F. Gentzel vs. Roxbury Lumber Company, there is due J.F. Gentzel $5,450.00 principal and interest $213.67 costs and sheriff's fees which amount to about $5,800.00 and

Whereas the party of the second part hereto has offered…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  2. Trenton Street Railway Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Bateman v. RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  4. McVoy v. BaumannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  5. Bridgewater v. Ocean City Ass'nNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bussell v. DeWalt Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Moran v. Fifteenth Ward B. L. Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Peddicord v. PeddicordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Gottlaub v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API