Legal Opinion

Lippincott v. Bridgewater

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On bill for specific performance.

1Opinion of the Court

Grey, V. C.

This bill is filed by the complainant Elizabeth A. Lippincott and her husband, against William Bridgewater, praying for the specific performance of a contract alleged to have been made between the parties for the conveyance of a lot of laud situate in the borough of Ocean City, Cape May county.

The complainant, on the 7th day of April, 1896, had a conversation with the defendant touching the purchase of the lot in question, and paid him $5, for which she received a receipt in the words and figures as follows:

“April 7th, 1896.
“Received from Elizabeth A. Lippincott 5 dollars on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re MerrillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1917
  2. Doan v. JonesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wollenburg v. RynarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  2. Richman v. RichmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Often v. StoutNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API