Legal Opinion
Franklin v. Welt
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill in this cause is filed by the complainants, as vendors, for the specific performance of a written contract for the sale of land in Elizabeth, New Jersey, to the defendant. The contract is in the following form:
"ELIZABETH, N.J. March 16, 1925.
Received from Sigmund Welt one hundred [$100] dollars on account of purchase price of property known as No. 331 Franklin St., Elizabeth, N.J. Purchase price to be $5,000.
Balance of $4,900 in cash on or before ninety [90] days, when a warranty deed will be delivered free and clear of all encumbrances.
Taxes, water rents, fire insurance to be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Kilday v. SchancuppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Bateman v. RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
- Krah v. WassmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. DorseyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stamato v. AgamieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Matlack v. ArendNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Carlsen v. CarlsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Vassar Holding Co. v. WuenschNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.