Hession v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.
The court granted a rehearing in this case to give further consideration to appellant’s contention that the jury was improperly instructed as to proximate cause and that the trial court gave an erroneous instruction which brought about the exoneration of the codefendant, Western Pacific Railway.
Here the dangerous condition of the wire had existed for many years. There was a clear duty under the law requiring the city to maintain the wires at a height of 22 feet above the street. Whether this violation of the statute on the part of the city was a proximate cause of respondent’s injury was for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Callahan v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.