Legal Opinion
Callahan v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1967No. Civ. 23295PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.
The appeal is from judgment for respondent based on an order sustaining demurrer to appellant’s third amended complaint. The action is grounded upon the alleged violation of the California Tort Claims Act. The succeeding paragraph contains, in substance, the charging allegations against the City and County of San Francisco :
On July 11, 1964, plaintiff Novelita Callahan, a minor, was a passenger in an automobile which was traveling on Brotherhood Way towards Lake Merced Boulevard, highways owned and maintained by the city. The area was frequently covered with fog, and there was fog on this…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Daniel v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Kennemur v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.