Banner Meat Co. v. Rieger
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
Before its maturity, the respondent purchased a promissory note which had been made by appellant and which had been obtained by fraud. The trial court held that there was nothing in the testimony tending to show that respondent had purchased in bad faith or without consideration, and instructed the jury to bring in a verdict for respondent for the amount due on the note. The correctness of this ruling is the chief question involved in this appeal.
*143The note in question was for $5,000, was executed by the' appellant, and made payable to the order of one G. K Ingalls, Jr., due in six months after…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keene v. BehanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Ireland v. ScharpenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Leavitt v. ThurstonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Winnovich v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Gray v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cross v. VossWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Kolmitz v. JansenWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- First National Bank v. DotsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1936