Legal Opinion

Kizziah v. Department of Transportation

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1981No. Civ. 49094PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RANCANELLI, P. J.

On appeal from an adverse judgment below, appellants, Department of Transportation of the State of California and Adriana Gianturco, Director of Transportation (hereafter DOT), 1 we consider an issue of first impression: whether legislation authorizing the DOT to annually apportion to local government agencies revenue derived from leased lands acquired for future highway purpose and providing for credit allowance or refunds offsetting lessees’ payment of local possessory interest taxes is facially invalid under the provisions of California Constitution, article XVI,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Paramount Unified School District v. Teachers Ass'n of Paramount, CTA/NEACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Mendez v. KurtenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Professional Engineers in California Government v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Citizens for Hatton Canyon v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API