Legal Opinion
Mendez v. Kurten
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1985No. B007127PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.
Appellant James P. Kurten (appellant), defendant in the underlying action for personal injuries, appeals from a postjudgment order denying his motion to clarify that portion of the judgment dealing with interest accruing on the judgment to the date of its satisfaction. 1
The sole issue before us is whether for the time between the entry of judgment and its satisfaction interest may be awarded on a judgment at the rate of 10 percent pursuant to Civil Code section 3291 (hereafter section 3291) and at the rate of an additional 10 percent pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Big Bear Properties, Inc. v. GhermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- North Oakland Medical Clinic v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Jones v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- League of Women Voters v. Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Steinfeld v. Foote-Goldman Proctologic Med. Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.