Legal Opinion
Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1974No. 1941, 1982, 1986PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
In these three cases consolidated for review, owners of vacant, unimproved land condemned by the state appeal from the denial of their motions for interest, costs and attorney's fees.
The State of Alaska needed Stewart & Grindle’s property for the 30th Avenue Couplet Highway Project. On July 29, 1971, the corporation was offered $94,900 for its property. This offer was rejected, and on March 23, 1972, the State filed a condemnation action to acquire the appellant’s realty. At the hearing on the States motion for an order of necessity and authority for the taking, the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- DeLisio v. Alaska Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- American National Watermattress Corp. v. ManvilleAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the PacificAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.