Legal Opinion

DeLisio v. Alaska Superior Court

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1987No. S-608PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

In this appeal we have been called upon to reconsider the question of whether a private attorney may be compelled to represent an indigent criminal defendant without just compensation. We now conclude that Article I, section 18 of the Alaska Constitution requires a negative answer to this important question. While we strongly affirm the attorney’s time-honored ethical obligation to provide cost-free representation to those in need and the corresponding obligation to accept court appointment on similar terms, Alaska’s constitution will not permit the state to deny…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Webb v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. J. D. Williamson, Jr. v. Paul E. Vardeman, Judge of Jackson County, and Susan StantonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API