DeLisio v. Alaska Superior Court
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
In this appeal we have been called upon to reconsider the question of whether a private attorney may be compelled to represent an indigent criminal defendant without just compensation. We now conclude that Article I, section 18 of the Alaska Constitution requires a negative answer to this important question. While we strongly affirm the attorney’s time-honored ethical obligation to provide cost-free representation to those in need and the corresponding obligation to accept court appointment on similar terms, Alaska’s constitution will not permit the state to deny…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Webb v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- J. D. Williamson, Jr. v. Paul E. Vardeman, Judge of Jackson County, and Susan StantonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Arnold v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.