Legal Opinion

People v. Reznick

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1946No. Crim. 2407PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Appellant was charged in the information with contributing to the delinquency of a minor in violation of section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, it being alleged that appellant did willfully, unlawfully and knowingly allow one Anita Yasquez, 14 years of age, to be registered in a hotel as the wife of a sailor, they not then being married. Appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction after trial by jury and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

There is little dispute as to the facts shown by the record. The complaining witness, Anita Yasquez, at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. AlbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Anderson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API