Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Jack

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1965No. Crim. 4324PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

A jury found defendant guilty of forging a prescription for a dangerous drug. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 4237. ) He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

On June 4, 1962, at about 11:45 a.m. Angelo J. Sehenone, a pharmacist employed at the Four Corners Pharmacy in Concord, received a telephone call from a person identifying himself as Dr. Bagnall in Richmond. The caller said that he was telephoning in a prescription of 50 capsules of dexedrine for one Adrian Ryan.

Sehenone wrote the prescription on a piece of paper captioned “Telephone Prescription” as the doctor was giving it to him over the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. HastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. CannadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. Jose R.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. MulqueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API