Legal Opinion

People v. Dillon

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1926No. Docket No. Crim. 2796PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Appellant, commissioner of finance of the city of Fresno, this state, and as such officer charged by the laws of the state and by the charter provisions of said city of Fresno with the receipt, safekeeping, transfer, and disbursement of the public funds of said city, was convicted upon eleven counts of an indictment which contained a total of thirty-three counts charging him with malfeasance in the use of public funds while he was occupying said office. The said eleven counts upon which convictions were had, and which constitute the basis of this appeal, are identical except as to dates,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  5. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API