Anderson v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
The appellant, defendant below, was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a child under the age of eighteen years by persuading her to engage in sexual intercourse with him. 1
The second paragraph of the statute upon which the indictment was based, defines a delinquent child. Included among the various definitions is a child “ * * * who is in danger of becoming or remaining a person who leads an idle, dissolute, lewd or immoral life * * * ” and who “ * * * takes part in or submits to any immoral act or conduct * *
Appellant’s first point is that since the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. RatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Etherton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. ReznickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wechter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. FlinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.