Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1963No. 271PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

The appellant, defendant below, was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a child under the age of eighteen years by persuading her to engage in sexual intercourse with him. 1

The second paragraph of the statute upon which the indictment was based, defines a delinquent child. Included among the various definitions is a child “ * * * who is in danger of becoming or remaining a person who leads an idle, dissolute, lewd or immoral life * * * ” and who “ * * * takes part in or submits to any immoral act or conduct * *

Appellant’s first point is that since the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. RatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Etherton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. People v. ReznickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Wechter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. FlinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API