Legal Opinion

People v. Albert

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1960No. Crim. 7054PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J. pro tem. *

Defendant was charged by indictment of a violation of section 653f of the Penal Code with having solicited Michael Flores Angulo to commit the crime of murder of Pearl Albert, who was the defendant’s wife. He was found guilty by a jury and was sentenced to the state prison for the term prescribed by law, with execution stayed pending appeal. His motion for a new trial was denied. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, hence we shall…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API