Vragnizan v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action based on a claim presented against the estate of the decedent for approximately six thousand dollars, of which sum the plaintiff alleges she was defrauded in a settlement of property rights had between herself and the decedent during the pendency of a suit for divorce in which they were-the parties. Plaintiff obtained judgment, and the defendant appeals.
After the plaintiff and the decedent had been married and living together as husband and wife for a period of about thirty years, the decedent on September 11, 1908, culminated a long course of cruel treatment of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Lee's Adm'r v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Collins v. O'LavertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hunt v. AuthierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Milekovich v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.