Legal Opinion
Washburn v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 19, 2003No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0107PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Steven and Jeanette Wash-burn, the Southern Arizona Homebuilders Association (SAHBA), and Washburn Company, Inc. (collectively the Washburns), appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Pima County. The Washburns contend on appeal that the county lacked statutory authority to adopt an ordinance requiring builders of single-family homes to incorporate design features allowing for greater wheelchair access and that the ordinance violates the Arizona Constitution. We affirm.
Background
¶2 On appeal from a grant of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Wages v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Continental Lighting & Contracting, Inc. v. Premier Grading & Utilities, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Forszt v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.