HUMPHREYS v. Stuart Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
-Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
The question here is in regard to the extent of the permissible enlargement of a non-conforming use under a zoning ordinance.
Under authority of the Act of May 6, 1929, P. L. 1551, the City of Philadelphia enacted an ordinance of August 10, 1933 which provided that no building should be erected or altered with respect to height and area for any use in any district unless and until a zoning permit had been obtained from the Bureau of Engineering, Surveys and Zoning; the word “building” was defined as including “structure”. There was a provision for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Rolling Green Golf Club CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Peirce AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Jenkintown Towing Service v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.