Legal Opinion
United States v. Dooley
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 3, 2005No. 05-6002/NAPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The military judge dismissed Appellant’s case with prejudice based on a violation of Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 707, the right to a speedy trial. The United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) agreed that a violation of R.C.M. 707 had occurred but disagreed with the military judge’s decision to dismiss with prejudice and reversed his decision. 1 This case illustrates the difficulty an intermediate appellate court faces when balancing the defer ence due a military judge under the abuse of discretion standard with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. TibbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. StellatoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. BowserUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Private E2 JARROD E. MCCLAINArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- United States v. Private First Class MARQUIS B. HAWKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. McMurrinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.