Legal Opinion
United States v. Bowser
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided October 3, 2014No. ACM 2014-08PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEBER, Judge:
The Government filed an interlocutory appeal under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862, in this matter. The Government challenges the military judge’s ruling to dismiss all charges and specifications with prejudice following the Government’s refusal to comply with the military judge’s order to produce trial counsel’s witness interview notes for an in camera inspection.
Background 1
The appellee was charged with three specifications of rape, one specification of forcible sodomy, and one specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Articles…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. SaukUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. Payton-O'brien and RavenscraftNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. ChisumUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. WrightUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. Major MICHAEL F. STELLATOArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.