Legal Opinion

Seybold v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1973No. State 155PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

On this review, the defendant raises two issues:

1. Whether the defendant’s plea of guilty was involuntary because the trial judge participated in the plea bargaining?

2. Whether the defendant’s plea of guilty was involuntary because it was motivated by the desire to obtain probation for his wife?

At the hearing on postconviction motions, the defendant acknowledged his participation in the crimes, and as we view the record he could hardly do otherwise. Also, although he recognizes he knowingly and understandably entered pleas of guilty, he now asserts they were involuntary.

Did the trial judge…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. White v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Farrar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. WolfeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In Re IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. McKnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Birts v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API