Legal Opinion

State v. Wolfe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1970No. State 133PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are presented by this appeal:

1. Did the defendant establish that his motion for leave to withdraw his guilty plea should have been granted to correct a manifest injustice?

2. Did the trial court adequately interrogate the defendant at the time of the acceptance of the defendant’s guilty plea?

Manifest injustice.

In State v. Reppin, 1 this court adopted the “manifest injustice” test which provided that a defendant would be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty if he could prove by clear and convincing evidence that his plea was made under any of the following nonexhaustive…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. The People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. HamptonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. White v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. RizerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Farrar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API