Legal Opinion

In Re Ibarra

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1983No. Crim. 22366PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus after conviction upon a plea of guilty of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) while armed (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (a)), and assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)). Petitioner’s plea was entered pursuant to a “package-deal” plea bargain in which his two codefendants also pled guilty. He was sentenced in accordance with the bargain to a three-year term for the robbery, a one-year armed enhancement and a consecutive term of one year for assault with a deadly weapon.

Petitioner raises three basic contentions. First, he…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API