Legal Opinion

Phillips v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1966PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The defendant initially contends the confessions should not have been admitted in evidence because he was denied counsel in violation of the Sixth amendment to the United States constitution which is made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth amendment. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), 372 U. S. 335, 342, 83 Sup. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. (2d) 799. This contention of the defendant raises an Escobedo type of problem. The defendant claims he asked for counsel during the interrogation after his arrest and the police denied his request and additionally argues if we find he did not request counsel, we…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. CiprianoMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. ShoffnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. ClappesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Embry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API