State v. McKnight
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Three issues are presented on appeal:
1. Were the pleas of guilty entered and induced as a result of the trial court’s failure to completely advise the defendant as to the consequences thereof?
2. Should the defendant have been permitted to withdraw his pleas of guilty prior to sentencing?
3. Did the trial court err in failing to appoint a physician to examine the defendant under sec. 971.14, Stats ?
Consequences of the guilty plea.
The defendant contends that the trial court should have informed the defendant that by pleading guilty there would be such a material change of circumstances that it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Commonwealth v. SantosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rahhal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ByrgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Debra A. E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.