Legal Opinion

Farrar v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1971No. State 45PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Doubts accumulate as to whether what is termed a “plea bargain” has a proper place or function in the administration of criminal justice.

Traditionally, it was no more than an offer by defendant to enter a plea of guilty if the charge brought was dropped to a lesser offense.

Such exchange of a guilty plea for a lowered charge, carrying less extreme penalties, was termed in court and corridor “copping a plea.”

By pleading guilty to the lesser charge, the defendant avoided the risk of exposure to the more severe penalty that was prescribed for the offense with which he was initially charged.1

*655By…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. WolfeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Young v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cross v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. McQuayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HamptonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. White v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Melby v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Grant v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API