Farrar v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Doubts accumulate as to whether what is termed a “plea bargain” has a proper place or function in the administration of criminal justice.
Traditionally, it was no more than an offer by defendant to enter a plea of guilty if the charge brought was dropped to a lesser offense.
Such exchange of a guilty plea for a lowered charge, carrying less extreme penalties, was termed in court and corridor “copping a plea.”
By pleading guilty to the lesser charge, the defendant avoided the risk of exposure to the more severe penalty that was prescribed for the offense with which he was initially charged.1
*655By…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. WolfeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Young v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Cross v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. McQuayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HamptonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. White v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Melby v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Grant v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.