Epperson v. Epperson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Glen Epperson and Tammy Epperson were divorced in 1985. The court awarded Tammy custody of the parties’ minor child, Lacy Lee Epperson, and ordered Glen to pay $300 per month in child support. At the time of the divorce, Glen earned approximately $2,600 per month after taxes.
On March 1, 1991, Tammy moved to modify Glen’s child support obligation to conform to Civil Rule 90.3 guidelines. She also alleged that Glen’s earnings had increased since the divorce. In response, Glen maintained that he would owe no support at all under the Rule 90.3…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Deivert v. OseiraAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Young v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Beaudoin v. BeaudoinAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Turinsky v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Boone v. BooneAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Routh v. AndreassenAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.