Legal Opinion
Young v. Williams
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1978No. 3310PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. RABINO WITZ, Justice.
This is an appeal from an adverse judgment of the superior court, entered against appellant Herbert Young for payment of unpaid child support due under a California decree of divorce. Young alleges several specifications of error all of which we find devoid of merit.
Young and appellee Nancy Williams were married in California, and thereafter two children were born of the marriage. A California divorce decree entered in 1961 required Young to pay $75.00 per month for the support of each of two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Kephart v. KephartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Slade v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Williams v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. BudkeMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.