Legal Opinion

C.R.B. v. C.C.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1998No. Nos. S-8104, S-8323PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Soon after their daughter Catherine’s divorce, Carl and Betty Clark1 took legal custody of Catherine’s two sons because of her drug addiction. That was three years ago. Roberto B., the boys’ father, now wants custody. He appeals the superior court’s denial without a hearing of his motion to modify custody. The court held that his allegations, even if true, do not show a substantial change of circumstances to warrant modification.

This case raises a novel question in an increasingly important realm of family law— custody disputes between parents and non-*377par…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Taylor v. MeekTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Blair v. BadenhopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Guinta v. DoxtatorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Rennels v. RennelsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Morino v. SwaymanAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API