Legal Opinion

Routh v. Andreassen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2001No. S-9458PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I,. INTRODUCTION

May a court impute income to a child support obligor without conducting a hearing if there is a genuine factual dispute about how much the obligor earned, and the court does not find that the obligor has failed to produce any relevant financial information? Holding that it may not, we reverse the order increasing Ron Routh's child support obligation and remand for further proceedings.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Kathi Lynn Andreassen and Ron Routh are divorced, and Kathi has primary physical custody of their son. In March 1999 Kathi filed a motion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Curley v. CurleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Adrian v. AdrianAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Koller v. ReftAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Williams v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hartley v. HartleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Ward v. UrlingAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API