Deivert v. Oseira
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and BRYNER, C. J., of the Court of Appeals. BURKE, Justice.
May a trial court deny a motion to modify a child custody order without considering the grounds on which it is made and without holding a hearing? We conclude here that the court must consider the motion, but need not hold a hearing if it finds that proof of the grounds asserted for a change would not justify that action.
Appellee Pauline Deivert Oseira obtained a default divorce in 1973 from her then husband, Richard Deivert. She was given custody of the two daughters…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Veazey v. VeazeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Nichols v. NicholsAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Sheridan v. SheridanAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Carle v. CarleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- King v. KingAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Long v. LongAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- C.R.B. v. C.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Craig v. McBrideAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- A.H. v. W.P.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.