Caudle v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
A majority of this Court is of opinion that the evidence offered by plaintiff was sufficient, when considered in the light most favorable to him, to require submission of the case to the jury. Hence, the assignment of error directed to the denial of defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit is overruled. Since a new trial is awarded for reasons stated below, we refrain from a discussion of the evidence presently before us. Harrison v. Kapp, 241 N.C. 408, 85 S.E. 2d 337; Davis v. Finance Co., ante, 233, 87 S.E. 2d 209.
In his initial instructions to the jury on the issue relating to damages,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lamm v. LorbacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Journigan v. Little River Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Rea v. . SimowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Blanton v. Carolina Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Bryant v. WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.